NO on 23

Prop. 23 is being bankrolled by oil and coal companies that want to kill California’s clean energy industry. If passed, the Dirty Energy Prop would destroy hundreds of thousands of California jobs and increase our addiction to fossil fuels. Our generation knows that NOW is the time for a clean energy future – to protect our national security, rebuild our economy, and prevent catastrophic climate change.

Prop 23 Funders

Donor Amount
Valero $4,050,000
Tesoro Companies $1,525,000

Flint Hills Resources $1,000,000
Adam Smith Foundation $498,000
Occidental Petroleum $300,000

National Petrochemical and Refiners Association $100,000
Tower Energy Group $100,000
World Oil Corp $100,000

Facts

  • Clean energy industry has the potential to revitalize the Californian economy and create
    millions of new jobs.1
  • California passed the first comprehensive global warming law in the United States. 2
  • California’s clean energy industry continues to lead, with silicon valley producing new solar technology, electric cars, and more. 3
  • Hundreds of local businesses, civic, labor, and environmental organizations are battling a small group of powerful out-of-state oil refiners and connected groups. 4
  • Primary funders of the Proposition are two of the biggest polluters in California – Tesoro
    and Valero (Texas-based oil companies with almost $150 billion in revenue in 2009). 5
  • There are over 500,000 California jobs in the clean tech sector and Prop 23 threatens the state’s economy. David Roland-Holst, UC Berkeley, “Energy Prices and California’s Economic Security,” Next 10, Oct. 2009.
  • Green jobs have grown 10 times faster than the average job growth in CA since 2005. 6 (.pdf)
  • 80% of the funding for the “Yes on 23″ campaign have come from outside of California 7
  • “No on 23″ campaign has bi-partisan support – co-chaired by George Shultz, Secretary of State under President Ronald Reagan and Tony Steyer, a hedge-fund manager and major Democratic donor. 8
  • According to the American Lung Association, poor air quality contributes to 19,000 premature deaths, 9,400 hospitalizations, and 300,000 cases of respiratory illness each year in California alone. The Dirty Energy Proposition would continue our unhealthy addiction to fossil fuels and stymie our progress towards a clean energy future. 9 (.pdf)
  • Over 100 economists from California and across the World called for citizens to protect the Global Warming Solutions Act. 10 (.pdf)

Articles

4 responses to “NO on 23”

  1. Laurie Wiegler

    Hi there, I’m an environmental/science reporter based in Conn. Glad to stumble across this link. One thought, though — plenty of people of my generation (40s, 50s) also care about the environment. Just a thought that you might want to tweak the verbiage. I’ve covered the BP oil spill since last July for Examiner.com and spoke about this at Univ. of Ga in Jan. Everyone speaking was approximately my age — so yes, we do care, as do the thousands, millions of the Gulf region affected by the spill. These are people of all ages and trust me, the average 60-year-old woman who needs a kidney replacement because she’s been breathing Corexit is as much an environmentalist as a 24-year-old undergrad in New Hampshire. That said, I applaud your efforts.

  2. Rick

    The State energy commissioner of Ca., said in a meeting sponsored by St. Mary’s last year that the laws mandated by AB32 can not be implemented with today’s technologies. They hope the solutions will be available when needed.! Unfortunately, the current law does not have alternatives built in and the Politicians must process and decide to alter the law as needed…

  3. Ilana Rieser

    California must be a leader in energy change and green jobs!

  4. Sophie Harrison-Wong

    Hi Power Vote,

    I see the importance of your grassroots youth efforts. Keep working hard to topple big oil in a smart way. We don’t want another Great Gulf Oil Spill in our lifetimes. (Or or children’s lifetimes… or the Earth’s lifetime…etc.)

    Best,
    Sophie

Leave a Reply